The terms “image” and “likeness” in the biblical passage from Genesis 1:26—“Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”—have sparked a great deal of theological and philosophical discussion. The nuances of these words raise questions about whether they refer to humanity’s appearance or essence in relation to God, and how different religious traditions interpret these concepts. Let’s delve into these two terms, their implications, and the potential variations in their meanings.
Image and Likeness: Appearance or Essence?
- Image: Appearance or Essence?
The word “image” is often interpreted to refer to some form of resemblance or reflection. In the context of Genesis 1:26, it has historically been debated whether this “image” refers to a physical resemblance (appearance) or a spiritual and intellectual one (essence).
- Appearance: If “image” refers to appearance, it would suggest that humanity resembles God in a physical or external way. However, many religious traditions (including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) argue against this interpretation, as God is typically seen as beyond physical form or limitations. In this sense, the “image” cannot refer to a literal, outward resemblance.
- Essence: More commonly, “image” is interpreted as a reference to humanity’s spiritual or intellectual qualities, such as reason, free will, morality, and the capacity for creativity. In this interpretation, the “image” of God in man reflects an essential similarity in terms of the ability to think, to choose, to love, and to act with moral conscience. This understanding of “image” aligns with the idea that humans, created in God’s image, have qualities that mirror divine attributes, even if they are not identical in form.
In this sense, “image” could reflect essence—God’s nature or fundamental characteristics being mirrored in human beings at a deeper, non-physical level.
- Likeness: Appearance or Essence?
The word “likeness” further deepens the discussion. Unlike “image,” which seems to suggest a more direct resemblance, “likeness” implies a broader similarity or conformity. Here, the question is whether it refers to external characteristics or internal qualities.
- Appearance: If “likeness” refers to physical appearance, it could be interpreted to mean that humans, in some way, are fashioned to resemble God’s form. However, as with “image,” this view runs into theological issues in traditions that emphasize God’s transcendence and formlessness. For instance, in Judaism, God is typically seen as incorporeal and beyond human understanding, so the idea of a physical likeness doesn’t seem plausible.
- Essence: More commonly, “likeness” is understood in terms of internal qualities—such as spiritual attributes, the ability to reason, or the capacity for moral decisions. It refers to the aspect of humanity that shares a divine nature, much in the way an artist might create a likeness of a person through a portrait, not based on an exact match of physical traits, but by capturing the essence of their personality or spirit.
In many religious traditions, “likeness” speaks to the ways in which humans reflect God’s character—how they are endowed with virtues like compassion, justice, and creativity that mirror God’s nature. This suggests that the “likeness” refers to the essence of God being reflected in human beings through their capacities for higher thinking, spirituality, and moral decision-making.
Interpretation Variations:
- Christianity: In Christian theology, the concept of being made in God’s “image and likeness” is often viewed as the possession of rationality, free will, the ability to love, and the capacity to form a relationship with God. The image of God is not typically thought to imply physical form, as God is considered spirit. Instead, this image is seen in the way humans are able to reflect God’s essence through their intellect and moral agency.
- Judaism: Jewish thought traditionally emphasizes that the image and likeness of God in humanity are not about physical resemblance, but rather about the moral and intellectual capacities that allow humans to engage in a covenantal relationship with God. The idea of “likeness” emphasizes the responsibility humanity has to act with justice, compassion, and righteousness, which are seen as reflective of God’s attributes.
- Islam: In Islam, while God is beyond any physical form, there is the understanding that humans are created with the capacity for reason, compassion, and free will, which are divine attributes. However, Islam also teaches that humans should never try to represent or “image” God physically, as this would go against the central tenet of God’s absolute transcendence.
- Hinduism: The Hindu concept of being made in the “image and likeness” of God can be understood through the idea of the divine spark (Atman) in all living beings. In this view, human beings are reflections of the divine essence (Brahman) rather than mere physical likeness, with the divine nature present in every person, manifesting through spiritual and moral growth.
Appearance vs. Essence: A Deeper Exploration
The tension between “appearance” and “essence” in the interpretation of “image” and “likeness” goes beyond the mere physical attributes and leads to questions about the nature of humanity’s relationship with the divine. Is humanity’s purpose to reflect God in terms of outward likeness, or is it about embodying God’s inner, spiritual qualities?
- Appearance would focus on the external or observable characteristics that resemble God’s form or traits, something tangible and immediately perceivable.
- Essence would refer to the invisible, internal qualities that align with the divine nature—our ability to think, choose, love, and create, which transcend physical attributes and connect us to something higher.
Conclusion
Ultimately, most theological interpretations align with the idea that “image and likeness” are not about physical resemblance but about the essence of God being reflected in humanity. Humans are seen as having the capacity to reflect God’s qualities in their ability to reason, love, and choose freely. These capacities are what set humanity apart and allow for the potential to live in harmony with the divine will, regardless of physical appearance. Thus, “image” and “likeness” refer not to how humans look, but to the deeper, spiritual connection they share with the divine essence.
If you like articles and books of a spiritual nature, we have lots to offer. I have dozens of essays and am continually adding more. We also have an entire series of books on spirituality available on our website (dinojamesbooks.com).
We love engaging with our readers. For more information contact Robert@dinojamesbooks.com.
